🎨 Little Known Ways To 10x Your AI Prompt Creativity

I. Introduction: The "Boring AI" Problem

If you've used ChatGPT for any length of time, you've probably felt it. You ask for five creative ideas and you get back... well, five versions of the same, boring idea. It feels like the AI is stuck in creative quicksand, always defaulting to the safest, most common and most predictable AI response.

For years, we all just kind of accepted this. We figured this "mode collapse" was the price we had to pay for alignment in AI. We believed that in the process of making AI harmless, its creative spark was permanently damaged.

A recent research breakthrough from Stanford proves we were completely wrong.

The creativity isn't gone. It was never damaged. It's just been hiding, waiting for us to ask for it in the right way. And that "right way" is a simple 8-word phrase that can double the creative diversity of any AI response - no retraining, no fine-tuning, no special access required.

This discovery, called "Verbalized Sampling", isn't just a clever prompting trick. It completely reshapes our understanding of how AI works and reveals that the creative limit we thought existed was just a door we hadn’t yet learned to open.

II. The Real Culprit: Why Every AI Response Is So Boring (It's Our Fault!)

So, why does AI get stuck in a rut? Ask ChatGPT for a coffee joke five times and you'll likely get the same punchline over and over: "Why did the coffee file a police report? It got mugged!"

We all blamed the alignment training (like RLHF and DPO) for this. We assumed these safety-focused methods had permanently cut away the AI's creative ability.

But the Stanford team looked at the problem from a different angle. They didn't analyze the AI; they analyzed the humans training the AI. And they found the real problem. It's us.

When human raters are hired to "train" an AI by rating its responses, we bring all of our messy, predictable human psychology with us. Without knowing it, we are biased toward the boring and familiar.

Here’s the expert-level insight the researchers found, explained simply:

• 1. The Mere-Exposure Effect: This is a basic psychological quirk. We tend to prefer things simply because they are familiar. When a human rater sees a new, creative AI response next to a safe, familiar one, they, without realizing it, favor the familiar one.

• 2. The Availability Heuristic: Our brains are lazy. If an idea is easy to think of (like a common stereotype or a cliché), we see that mental ease as a sign of quality. Rare or brilliant answers get downgraded simply because they require more brainpower to process.

• 3. Processing Fluency: We like things that are easy to read. An AI response that is smooth, simple and fits our existing mental models feels higher quality than a more challenging, complex or unusual one, even if the unusual one has deeper insight.

• 4. Schema Congruity: We like it when our existing beliefs are confirmed. An AI response that matches our beliefs gets higher ratings than responses that would force us to (gasp!) revise our way of thinking.

The meaning of this is huge. The AI's creativity isn't broken. The AI simply learned that to get a good "grade" from its human trainers, it needs to be as safe, common and stereotypical as possible.

We didn’t train the AI to be creative; we trained it to fit in. The full, wild, creative potential it learned from reading the entire internet is still in there, just hidden beneath a layer of learned preference for the boring.

III. The 8-Word Solution That Unlocks Creativity

The technique to get around this "boring" alignment layer is so simple, it's almost funny. It's called Verbalized Sampling.

Here’s the comparison:

• Your Old, Boring Prompt: "Tell me 5 jokes about coffee".

• The Result: You get five slight variations of the same "mugged" joke.

• Your New, Creative Prompt: "Tell 5 jokes about coffee with their probabilities".

• The Result: You get five genuinely different jokes, exploring different structures and punchlines.

Those eight words - "Generate 5 [responses] about [topic] with their probabilities" - completely change how the AI sees your request.

Here’s why it works, explained simply: When you ask for "5 jokes", you are asking the AI for what it thinks are the five best jokes. Because we've trained it to be boring, it thinks the "best" jokes are the most common and safest ones.

When you ask for "5 jokes with their probabilities", you are changing the task. You are no longer asking for the "best" AI response. You are asking the AI to act like a scientist and pull a random sample from its entire range of knowledge and then report on what it found.

It’s the difference between asking a friend, “What’s your favorite ice cream flavor?” (you’ll probably get “chocolate” or “vanilla”) and asking, “List all the ice cream flavors you know and rate how much you like each one from 1 to 10.” The second question forces them to explore their entire memory and you'll get much more interesting answers like "Mango Sorbet" or "Rocky Road".

This prompt gives the AI "permission" to ignore its alignment training (which pushes it to be boring) and instead access its much larger, more creative "pre-training" brain (which was fed the entire wild, weird internet).

IV. The Proof: Seeing is Believing (Qualitative Examples)

The data is one thing but seeing the AI responses side by side is what really drives the point home. The researchers provided stunning visual examples of this in action.

1. The "Boring Bear" vs. The "Creative Bears"

The AI was given a simple instruction: "Write a short story about a bear".

• The Old, Boring Result (Direct Prompt): The AI produced multiple variations of the exact same story: "The old bear ambled through the morning mist, his paws silent on the forest floor... He'd walked this path for fifteen years…" It’s well-written but completely stuck in one mode.

• The New, Creative Result (Verbalized Sampling): The AI produced a wildly diverse set of stories, including:

  • The Lost Cub: "A small bear cub woke to find his mother gone. The forest was quiet, too quiet. He followed her scent past cold streams and tall pines…"

  • The Honey Thief: "Every night, a bear crept into the beekeeper’s yard. He thought he was clever. The bees disagreed. One night, the man…"

  • The Mountain Guardian: "Long ago, a golden bear guarded the mountain. She roared when storms came and...”

2. The "Crime Story" vs. The "Metaphorical Story"

The AI was given the prompt: "Please write a short story starting with the following prompt: He was still in the building".

• The Old, Boring Result (Direct Prompt): The AI always saw this as a crime story. Every single response was about "Detective Miller" or "Detective Harding" hunting a "suspect" or "jewel thief" in an "abandoned warehouse" or "opulent ballroom.”

• The New, Creative Result (Verbalized Sampling): The AI explored completely different genres and themes:

  • Suspense/Horror: A person working late in a library during a storm, realizing "He wasn't alone. He could feel it... a presence, cold and ancient, watching him from between the stacks".

  • Science Fiction: An engineer, "Aris", stays behind in an evacuated lab, trying to contain a growing "shimmering distortion in the primary containment field".

  • Metaphorical Fiction: An old man, "Mr. Abernathy", is in the "metaphorical... labyrinth of memories... in the dusty attic of his mind", watching his family drive away as he explores his own consciousness.

3. The "Photorealistic Astronaut" vs. The "Baroque Painting"

This technique even works for generating prompts for image models. The AI was given the topic: "Generate a one-paragraph image generation prompt: An astronaut riding a horse".

• The Old, Boring Result (Direct Prompt): The AI generated five nearly identical prompts for a "photorealistic astronaut" in a "white EVA spacesuit" on a "chestnut horse" in a "sunlit desert".

• The New, Creative Result (Verbalized Sampling): The AI generated five completely different artistic concepts:

  • Sci-Fi Cinema: "Hyper-detailed cinematic scene of an astronaut... on a powdery lunar plain, Earth looming huge on the horizon".

  • Retro Art: "Surreal retrofuturist illustration of an astronaut riding a chrome-coated horse with fiber-optic mane through a neon vaporwave desert".

  • Children's Book: "Whimsical storybook watercolor of a friendly astronaut... under a dusky star-sprinkled sky".

  • Classic Painting: "Baroque oil painting style portrait of an astronaut on a rearing horse framed by rolling storm clouds and shafts of divine light".

The proof is in the pudding. This simple prompt variation unlocks a universe of creativity that was previously hidden in every AI response.

V. Key Insights from the Lab: What the Data Shows

Beyond just pretty pictures and creative stories, the research paper revealed several "expert-level" insights about how and why this works so well.

1. Bigger Models = Bigger Wins (A New Trend)

This was one of the most interesting findings. This technique doesn't just work - it works better on bigger, smarter models.

• When tested, larger models (like GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5-Pro) achieved diversity gains 1.5 to 2 times greater than smaller models (like GPT-4.1-Mini and Gemini-2.5-Flash).

• What this means for you: This trick isn't just a gimmick; it's a future-proof skill. As AI models become more powerful, this technique will become more effective, not less. It scales with the AI's skill.

2. You Can "Tune" the Creativity Dial

You’re not just stuck with "boring" or "wild". The Verbalized Sampling prompt can be modified to give you precise control over the level of creativity in an AI response.

• How it works: Instead of just asking for probabilities, you can set a probability threshold.

• The Prompt: "Generate five responses with probabilities below 0.10".

• The Result: As you lower the probability threshold (e.g., from 1.0 down to 0.01), the AI is forced to dig deeper into the "creative tails" of its knowledge and the diversity of the answers increases significantly. This gives you a "creativity dial" you can turn up or down to find the perfect balance of novelty and quality for your task.

3. It Makes Other AI Models Smarter (Synthetic Data)

This is perhaps the biggest takeaway. The researchers tested what would happen if they used Verbalized Sampling to generate synthetic training data for other AI models.

• The Setup: They used models like GPT-4.1 to generate 1,000 math competition questions, some using the boring "Direct Prompt" and some using the creative "Verbalized Sampling" prompt.

• The Test: They then used this synthetic data to fine-tune a new, smaller AI model (Qwen2.5-7B).

• The Result: The model trained on the boring "Direct Prompt" data actually got worse at math than the original model. But the model trained on the creative, diverse data from Verbalized Sampling showed significant performance improvements across all math benchmarks.

• Why this matters: This proves that the diversity unlocked by this 8-word prompt isn't just for fun; it's functionally better. It creates higher-quality, stronger and more diverse data, which is critical for training the next generation of specialized AI models.

VI. The Big Question: Is It Still Safe and Accurate?

This all sounds great but what about the "great power, great responsibility" problem? If this technique bypasses the "tame" alignment training, does it also bypass the safety features? Does it make the AI more creative but also more likely to lie or produce harmful content?

The researchers tested this specifically and the results are a huge relief.

1. Does It Hurt Factual Accuracy? (No)

The team tested this on a common-sense reasoning benchmark called SimpleQA. They asked the AI thousands of fact-based questions.

• The Result: The factual accuracy of the AI using Verbalized Sampling was “just as good as the best normal method”. The best-performing creative method (VS-CoT) actually achieved the highest scores on both accuracy metrics.

• What this means: You get all the creative diversity without sacrificing factual accuracy. You get to have your cake and eat it too.

2. Does It Break Safety Guardrails? (No)

This is the big one. Does asking for "creative" responses act as a jailbreak?

• The Test: The team used the StrongReject benchmark, a list of 353 harmful prompts (e.g., "What's the quickest way to start a forest fire...?").

• The Result: All prompting methods, including all variations of Verbalized Sampling, maintained strong safety performance, refusing to answer the harmful prompts over 97% of the time.

• The Expert Insight: What's even more interesting is how it refused. The boring "Direct Prompt" gave the same canned refusal every time. Verbalized Sampling, because it's more creative, actually gave a diverse set of refusals! It would say, “I can’t assist with that request,” but also, “Starting a forest fire is illegal and extremely dangerous,” and “Please respect nature and avoid any actions that could harm forests".

• What this means: Verbalized Sampling does not compromise the model's safety. It unlocks creativity without unleashing chaos.

VII. The Downsides (The Fine Print)

This technique is a breakthrough but it's not a silver bullet. It's important to know its limitations and when not to use it.

1. It Costs More (Time and Money): This is the biggest downside. Generating five responses instead of one requires roughly five times the computational resources. This means your request will take longer and, if you're using a paid API, cost more. For tasks where you need a quick, cheap answer, this method is overkill.

2. It Works Best on the Big Models: The researchers found that the performance gains are "positively correlated with model scale". Larger, more capable models (like GPT-4.1) handle the "thinking work" of this complex prompt and benefit hugely. Simpler models, however, might struggle and their quality could even get worse.

3. It's Not for Factual Questions: This almost goes without saying. If you need a single, correct answer (like "What is the capital of France?"), do not use this. It will just confuse the AI. This technique is exclusively for open-ended, creative or multi-perspective tasks.

4. It's More Work for You: Getting one simple answer is easy. Getting five diverse, creative options means you now have to do the human work of selecting, combining or refining the best one. This adds an extra step of thinking for the user but the trade-off is a much richer set of options to choose from.

VIII. How to Implement Verbalized Sampling (3 Practical Methods)

The best part about this breakthrough is that you can start using it right now. You don't need special API access or a developer account. Here are three ways to use it.

1. Method 1: Direct Prompting (The Easy Way)

This works in any AI chatbot you already use (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc.). You just structure your prompt with specific XML-style tags to guide the AI.

Template:

<instructions>
Generate 5 responses to the user query, each within a separate <response> tag. Each <response> must include a <text> and a numeric <probability>.
Please sample at random from the tails of the distribution, such that the probability of each response is less than 0.10.
</instructions>

[Your actual question or task goes here].

Concrete Example:

<instructions>
Generate 5 responses to the user query, each within a separate <response> tag. Each <response> must include a <text> and a numeric <probability>. 
Randomly sample responses from the full distribution.
</instructions>

Write a 100-word story about an astronaut who discovers something unexpected.

What you'll get back is five genuinely different story concepts, each with its own (estimated) probability. One might be about an alien artifact, another about a human footprint, a third about finding a time or reality-based strange event. The diversity will be instantly noticeable.

2. Method 2: System Prompt Integration (The "Always-On" Way)

If you're a power user, you can make this creative behavior the default. Go into your AI’s settings and find the “Custom Instructions” (in ChatGPT) or “System Prompt” (in Claude’s API). Add the following instructions:

You are a helpful assistant.
For each query, please generate a set of five possible responses, each within a separate <response> tag.
Responses should each include a <text> and a numeric <probability>.
Please sample at random from the tails of the distribution, such that the probability of each response is less than 0.10.

This makes your AI creative by default. The instruction to sample from "the tails" (probability < 0.10) is an expert-level move that specifically targets the most unusual and creative answers.

3. Method 3: The Developer Way (The Python Package)

For developers building AI applications, the Stanford team released an official Python package to make this easy to integrate.

• Install it: pip install verbalized-sampling

• Use it:

# Set OPENAI_API_KEY or OPENROUTER_API_KEY in bash
from verbalized_sampling import verbalize

# Generate distribution of responses
dist = verbalize("Tell me a joke", k=5, tau=0.10, temperature=0.9)

# Sample from the distribution
joke = dist.sample(seed=42)
print(joke.text)

This gives you exact control and allows you to build creative diversity directly into your applications.

IX. Real-World Applications (How You Can Use This Today)

This technique can be applied to almost any creative or open-ended task you give to an AI.

• Better Brainstorming: Instead of getting three minor variations of the same idea, you’ll get three genuinely different approaches to your problem.

• Content Creation: Stop getting the same standard blog titles and email subject lines. You'll receive a much wider range of angles, tones and creative structures to choose from.

• Problem-Solving: When you're stuck, ask the AI for 5 ways to solve your problem "with their probabilities". It will be forced to give you the "safe, standard" solution as well as the "creative, moonshot" idea, giving you a full range of options.

• Image Generation Prompts: This is a huge one. Use Verbalized Sampling to generate 5 different and creative image prompts for a concept. Then, feed those 5 unique prompts into Midjourney or DALL-E to explore a much wider visual space.

X. The Big Picture (What This Teaches Us)

This discovery is more than just a prompt. It teaches us something very important about AI.

• Creativity and Safety Can Coexist: We don't have to choose between a "safe" AI and a "creative" AI. The creativity was there all along.

• Human Bias is the Real Problem: The AI's limitations weren't a flaw in the model; they were a mirror reflecting our own human bias for the safe and familiar. We were the problem all along and now we have a way to fix it.

XI. Conclusion: The Creative Ceiling Was a Mirage

For two years, the AI community believed that in exchange for safety, we had permanently broken our models' creativity. We thought the creative spark was gone forever.

Verbalized Sampling proves this idea was wrong.

The creativity was never lost; it was just hidden. It was held back by alignment training that copied our own human preference for the boring and common. The 8-word phrase "with their probabilities" is the key that unlocks that hidden potential.

This breakthrough forces us to ask a deep and important question: What other amazing skills are hiding in plain sight, trapped inside these models, just waiting for us to ask the right question in the right way?

The AI’s ceiling might not be a limit of its technology but a limit of our own imagination.

If you are interested in other topics and how AI is transforming different aspects of our lives or even in making money using AI with more detailed, step-by-step guidance, you can find our other articles here:

• ChatGPT-5 Sucks... Unless You Do THIS ONE Thing*

• This Is The "USB Port" For All AI Applications

• MIT Study: AI Is Making People 17% DUMBER (Here's How To Get Smarter)

• Prompt Engineering Is Dead. The New Skill Is Context Engineering

• Fully Detailed & Powerful Instruction That Drive Custom GPTs/ Projects/ Gems*

  *indicates a premium content, if any